I certainly hope HTML5 developers stick to a strict standard of implementation. We’re just getting to the point now where “developers” (quotes for a reason) are learning not to rely on browsers to correct and display bad markup properly. In addition, as the web becomes less and less a series of sites and more a mash-up of web services, online applications and syndicated content, using strict markup is key to manipulating and maintaining the integrity of the DOM.
The HTML5 movement looks to be a great leap forward in the right direction, can’t wait to get my hands on this book :-). That first chapter was a fun read.
It’s nice to know there are a conscious group pushing standards, semantic HTML, and future technologies to bring down the idea that anyone who can run a WYSIWYG is web designer.
Looking forward to the era of compliant coders, not obtuse dreamweavers.
This appears to be an article upon “A Brief History of HTML” opposed to markup. There are markup languages, that people actually commonly use, outside of HTML.
I did enjoy your extremely brief mention of XHTML 1.1 apart from 1.0. I always seem to get pissed when I bring such things up or mention differences thereof.
This is a good example of how a market-driven standard with a few key leaders (such as Ian Hickson) proved more suitable than the “pure” consensus approach taken by the W3C.
Apple, Microsoft, etc are happy to conform and advance a standard like HTML5 because it’s driven by market demands rather than bureaucratic processes.
Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
dpenny
Nicely written article but I couldn’t be more delighted to hear about the HTML 5 book, Jeremy. Your DOM scripting book is fantastic and I will definitely be ordering this latest work.
I have translate “the article into spanish”:http://www.desarrollofacil.com/breve-historia-del-marcado-por-jeremy-keith-para-a-list-apart/ as I found very interesting and useful to understand a little where it comes from this standard of so many speak.
In the book you recommend using the HTML5 doctype right now. Won’t that cause most browsers to fall back to “quirks” mode? I can’t imagine that IE 6 or 7 recognize that doctype. (Or am I misunderstanding how doctype works?)
27 Reader Comments
Back to the Articlebeegro
I certainly hope HTML5 developers stick to a strict standard of implementation. We’re just getting to the point now where “developers” (quotes for a reason) are learning not to rely on browsers to correct and display bad markup properly. In addition, as the web becomes less and less a series of sites and more a mash-up of web services, online applications and syndicated content, using strict markup is key to manipulating and maintaining the integrity of the DOM.
Caleb Ogden
The HTML5 movement looks to be a great leap forward in the right direction, can’t wait to get my hands on this book :-). That first chapter was a fun read.
It’s nice to know there are a conscious group pushing standards, semantic HTML, and future technologies to bring down the idea that anyone who can run a WYSIWYG is web designer.
Looking forward to the era of compliant coders, not obtuse dreamweavers.
austincheney
This appears to be an article upon “A Brief History of HTML” opposed to markup. There are markup languages, that people actually commonly use, outside of HTML.
I did enjoy your extremely brief mention of XHTML 1.1 apart from 1.0. I always seem to get pissed when I bring such things up or mention differences thereof.
jonathanconway
Interesting read.
This is a good example of how a market-driven standard with a few key leaders (such as Ian Hickson) proved more suitable than the “pure” consensus approach taken by the W3C.
Apple, Microsoft, etc are happy to conform and advance a standard like HTML5 because it’s driven by market demands rather than bureaucratic processes.
dpenny
Nicely written article but I couldn’t be more delighted to hear about the HTML 5 book, Jeremy. Your DOM scripting book is fantastic and I will definitely be ordering this latest work.
StraTDeS
I have translate “the article into spanish”:http://www.desarrollofacil.com/breve-historia-del-marcado-por-jeremy-keith-para-a-list-apart/ as I found very interesting and useful to understand a little where it comes from this standard of so many speak.
Greetings
strider72
Keith—
In the book you recommend using the HTML5 doctype right now. Won’t that cause most browsers to fall back to “quirks” mode? I can’t imagine that IE 6 or 7 recognize that doctype. (Or am I misunderstanding how doctype works?)