The UX of Learning

by Tyler Tate

11 Reader Comments

Back to the Article
  1. Need to comment on the ubiquitous use of the term USER. Human beings who “use” are drug addicts. When referring to people who do things, just say “people.” It irks me tremendously that the sloppy writing allowed in the tech industry constantly dehumanizes people into “users.” People do things. Users are a society problem. If you want people, that is, fellow human beings, to connect with your application, your web site, then refer to them directly.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  2. @indilynx — the term “user” is meant to differentiate from “viewers” like on television. It is not de-humanizing, it is actually quite the opposite. The fact that it means something else in the context of drugs and alcohol is quite irrelevant. “Users” are separate from designers, clients, and developers — in this context — even though all of the above are people.

    @Tyler Tate — I have mixed feelings about this article. On the one hand your suggestions and examples for applying your lesson are quite good. The lesson of informing a user before prompting them to commit is a good lesson that many, many people — clients and designers alike — can use.

    However…

    I think the theoretical aspects of this article are a bit irresponsible. In a nutshell, you’re talking about facilitating “decision-making”, not learning.

    Decision-making is the process of gathering information, forming an opinion and ultimately making a choice that leads to a desired result (those aren’t formal steps, for the record). Learning, on the other hand, is the process of gaining an understanding of a previously unknown subject, even as an end to itself, involving things like making information understandable, memorable, and progressive in presentation.

    Half way through the article you even began to say “decision-making” rather than “learning”.

    Learning may be likely in decision-making (although not necessary) but decision-making can be completely absent from learning.

    I appreciate the article and the lesson, and I think there is some solid content in here. I think this article could use some editing though, to purify the separation between learning and decisions, because they appear in combination throughout the article.

    Regardless of my opinions, thank you for the article.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  3. @JMarsh I encourage this observation. There article is more about decision-making. That said, decision-support is a key function of mobile learning and therefore still relevant to learning.

    As an educator & eLearning specialist, I want to emphasize the importance of sound pedagogy—bad instruction can do harm. For example, in language learning, poor instruction can lead students to “fossilize” (memorize) grammatical mistakes.

    It’s great that ALA is addressing the learning issue. Just be careful not to over generalize. Good teaching takes as much skill and study as good design.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  4. Learning is certainly intertwined with decision-making. This article is about user experience (person experience?)—and most of what people learn is by experience.

    The experience you create for your users is just like any other experience one may have in life. Experiences can invite us, encourage us, and lead us to conclusions about what we want (or even what we believe in). But experiences can also intimidate and confuse us.

    Very few important decisions (like ones involving money) are made without learning. And learning, whether by books, teachers, pixels, or the school of hard knocks, is always accompanied by an experience.

    Experience truly is the best teacher. So as designers of experiences, making the connection between learning and decision-making is paramount.

    Thank you for this article Tyler.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  5. Thanks Tyler and ALA for helping usher in the awareness that our knowledge of learning needs to team up with our knowledge of design, for the benefit of both sides and the future of learning in a digital world.

    I’ve been specializing in Learning Interface Design for about 10 years now and I still feel like a nube most days.  It’s a sub-discipline with a past it can only borrow and a future in the making.  As you point out in this article, knowing more about how people learn is important to good interface design, but it’s absolutely critical to Learning Interface Design (where the websites and technologies you create are dedicated specifically to an educational or training purpose.) 

    The research literature in Education and HCI indirectly produce nuggets of insight to inform design for learning, but oh the mountainous terrain of haystacks you have to machete through to get to these.  I’m working on it.  For anyone involved in Learning Interface Design, you might find something of interest at my blog or at the research community Mendeley where we’ve started a group in this area.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  6. A very interesting post, to see the learning process broken down into the way we think. We all learn new things every day, come across new challenges, and the internet is definitely one of the main sources of our knowledge.
    I think you have really grasped what we look for in a site when we are researching, which is the ability to compare, save and return to items of interest. All of these sites have great features and aspects that cover these important areas.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  7. As much as the compare, bookmarking and annotation features that consumer sites are helpful, I think reviews are by far the best tool for people to research and make decisions. Personally, I don’t buy anything off Amazon that’s less than 4 stars, and even then I will read the worst reviews to try to determine if I might have a similar problem, or if the person was victim of an inevitable lemon.

    The main issue is context. If I’m interested in a tent, for instance, I might be comparing two similar products.  Maybe one is a pound or two lighter, which may seem like the better offer (all else being equal).  However, if there are multiple reviews by actual people who have used the tent saying the lighter tent is awkward when folded making it difficult to carry (something the product specs couldn’t tell you) then I would steer the other direction. The real-world context provides more information than a 100 page spec sheet ever could.

    Generally I think there is a pervasive level of suspicion when people are researching products, for instance, even if the site is credible. Is this medium the medium I’m used to? Does it actually fit in an overhead bin? Does the battery actually last eight hours? These questions can be answered credibly with reviews, alleviating the skepticism. But really anything we can do as designers/developers to connect users with real information is always helpful.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  8. indilynx is simply quoting Jakob Nielsen.

    A model should be developed for how a user can accurately detect false information, it’s a type of learning, but I think you would need to break the Compare step down further. For example, how do you spot fake reviews on Amazon.com? I have my own methods, I’m very interested to hear others.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  9. First off, great article. With the intelligence level of ALA’s readership, it takes a brave person to submit an article.

    I found your 6 steps of learning/decision-making an insightful look in to a user’s way of starting a project. And it reminded me of the Situational Leader diagram (i found a pdf of one here: theleadershipcollege.com, i’m sure there are other places). Both processes focus on a users’ confidence level.


    For example, you noted 6 steps:
    1 – Initiation uses “uncertainty”
    2 – Selection uses “spike in confidence”
    3 – Exploration goes back to “uncertainty”
    4 – Formulation is another “increased confidence”
    5 – Collection notes an increase in confidence
    6 – Action

    Now take Situational Leader – D1-D4:
    D1 – enthusiastic beginner – low competence + high commitment
    D2 – disillusioned learner – low to some competence + low commitment
    D3 – capable but cautious performer – moderate to high competence + variable commitment
    D4 – self-reliant achiever – High competence + high commitment

    The two processes are not identical, but the similarities are evident. Both processes focus on the user’s confidence level as it correlates to their comprehension of newly acquired information.

    I wonder if there are other related studies out there that focus on user confidence? Thanks Tyler, it’s great article to make you stop and think.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  10. In regards to spotting bad or false reviews. I tend to cross examine reviews.

    For example if you pick up a book on the subject of beginners PHP. There’s those who will say “This is the ultimate book” where others will say “The book is full of mistakes and doesn’t explain anything in detail”.

    My solution? I’ll check it out for myself, look through the book, and make my own decision.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.
  11. Great article! Thanks. There’s lots of very valuable issues covered. I just want to latch on to one big issue in this comment. Basically, the article theoretically describes learning as a discrete set of steps. Now, I think most people would say in practice the boundaries are fuzzy. But I want to go a step further in this comment and say that the vast range of learning styles (not to mention that people change learning styles frequently and even viewing can involve some learning) lead to problems when implementing steps. They help structure, but the steps may not always be in the right spacing to meet every learner’s intellectual gait. Over the years, I’ve come to adopt the scaffolding approach, which I’ve found is much more flexible in dealing with changing and evolving learning approaches. It’s less structured, but for one-on-one learning the scaffolding approach has greatly enhanced learning in my experiences.

    Copy & paste the code below to embed this comment.