Despite the title of your comment being a sarcastic dig, I decided to give you the benefit of the doubt & read your full comment. In terms professionalism and complaining about immaturity and anti-social behaviour, I think you set off on the wrong foot there.
If you _had_ read the article you would have found its tone to be playful rather than agressive or anti-social, or that was certainly my intention. Characterising the specification as a douchebag was simply a storytelling device, trying to make the article less bland than a specification. If my intentions don’t come across in the article as a whole, that’s my fault. If you judge my article after sampling the first 5 words, that’s your problem I’m afraid.
If you’re interested in my thoughts on offensiveness, I rambled a bit over at “hacker news”:http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3807640