The A List Apart Blog Presents:

On Our Radar: Faux-Naive

Article Continues Below

“[R]edesigning the Google logo is an impossible task without a perfect answer.” —Armin Vit

Animated gif of Google’s new wordmark. Source: Google.
Google’s new wordmark. Source: Google.

Google—it’s not just for (and by) engineers anymore. Slowly but surely, the search+ giant has come to the realization that design matters. This week, in the wake of a massive structural shift, the company unveiled a new logo (designed in-house). Reactions on Twitter ranged from the guttural—I hate it! I love it!—to the more nuanced; some saw Google’s effort as cynical, and others dubbed it “faux-naive.”

On the web, thoughtful analyses of the new mark didn’t tarry:

  • Gerry Leonidas’s largely formal reading explains why the redesign fails: “The quirky modulated style [of the old mark] had…the benefit of disassociating the logo from any connotations of child-like lettering that the primary colors might suggest.”
  • Tobias Frere-Jones offers a historical interpretation: “The old logo had a calligraphic origin, building every curve on a tilted axis. Without that supporting context in the rest of the word, this ‘e’ looks forced.”
  • And Armin Vit’s take is pragmatic: “What’s important is that the new logo is exactly right and perfectly calibrated for what it needs to do.”

But maybe we’re spilling too much ink over this. After all, as Scott Jehl points out, “Google’s endorsement of the web as a home for apps (rather than just a place for linking to app stores) is bigger news than the logo update.” —Caren Litherland, editor

Your weekend reading

  1. Web animation expert Rachel Nabors has written up her reasoning for only speaking at conferences with a code of conduct. Her brave post addresses arguments that some organizers have mounted against offering a code of conduct, and explains why it’s a make-or-break option for many speakers. Her conclusion: there’s really no excuse for a conference not to have one. —Anna Debenham, technical editor
  2. The W3C is work­ing on the pre­load spec­i­fi­ca­tion that will al­low user agents to pre­load re­sources us­ing the <link> el­e­ment. Typekit’s Bram Stein demonstrates how these preload hints can be used to optimize web performance when it comes to loading web fonts. Using preload hints, web developers can tell the browser to preload web fonts before it has finished downloading the HTML and all the CSS files; and fonts that are down­loaded ear­lier will ren­der sooner. —Michelle Kondou, developer
  3. Book cover designer, typeface designer, and Cooper Type grad Isabel Urbina Peña has launched YES, EQUAL, a database (plus commentary) whose goal is to close the gender gap in communication design. Urbina Peña hopes that the site will “make it easier for conference organizers to be more inclusive” and “little by little make room for equality in the creative world.” —Caren Litherland, editor
  4. It shocks me that half of the general public has low literacy. In a Contents post from 2012 that I find myself returning to again and again, Angela Colter does a fantastic job of showing that decisions around plain language, consistent design, and focused content have the ability to improve lives.—Aaron Parkening, project manager
  5. Last week, Salesforce relaunched their pattern library and it’s the most comprehensive digital style guide I’ve seen. It doesn’t just document their styles, it’s also educational, explaining the theory behind the designs, such as in their motion section. It’s a site I’ll be referencing a lot for inspiration. —Anna Debenham, technical editor

Your must-see hashtag

#FreeCooperUnion

Overheard in ALA Slack

“you all are raising murderbirds, well done.”

Your Thursday gif

A gif showing Miss Piggy shaking her head and saying ‘No’.

No Comments

Got something to say?

We have turned off comments, but you can see what folks had to say before we did so.

More from ALA

Design for Amiability: Lessons from Vienna

Computing was born in a Viennese café. Between 1928 and 1934, while Hitler plotted and Europe crumbled, a motley crew of mathematicians, philosophers, architects, and economists gathered weekly to puzzle out the limits of reason—and invented Computer Science in the process. What made their collaboration possible wasn't just brilliance (though they had plenty). It was amiability: the careful design of a social space where difficult people could disagree without destroying each other. Longtime A List Apart contributing author Mark Bernstein mines this forgotten history for lessons that might just save today's embattled web from its worst impulses. Spoiler: it involves better coffee service and the looming threat of public humiliation.

From Beta to Bedrock: Build Products that Stick.

Building towards bedrock means sacrificing some short-term growth potential in favour of long-term stability. But the payoff is worth it: products built with a focus on bedrock will outlast and outperform their competitors, and deliver sustained value to users over time. Liam Nugent shows us how.

User Research Is Storytelling

At a time when budgets for user experience research seem to have reached an all-time low, how do we get stakeholders and executives alike invested in this crucial discipline? Gerry Duffy walks us through how the research we conduct is much like telling a compelling story, complete with a three-act narrative structure, character development, and conflict resolution—with a happy ending for researchers and stakeholders alike.

Discover more from A List Apart

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading